Earl Spencer Alleges Royal Family “Contempt” for Diana in New Book
Charles Spencer, brother of the late Princess Diana, has published a new book making allegations against King Charles III, including claims of "contempt" for Diana and an argument over the princes walking behind her coffin. Buckingham Palace issued a rare…
Philadelphia, PA, September 22, 2026 — A new book by Charles Spencer, the brother of the late Princess Diana, has ignited a public exchange with Buckingham Palace, featuring allegations concerning King Charles III’s past conduct and views regarding Diana. The book asserts claims of “contempt” directed at Princess Diana by the current monarch, according to reports.
Furthermore, the publication details an alleged argument that occurred concerning the princes walking behind their mother’s coffin during her funeral procession. This specific claim has contributed to the unfolding public discourse.
In response to the assertions made in the book, Buckingham Palace issued a rare public rebuttal. The palace’s statement was a notable intervention, given the institution’s general practice of not commenting on such matters. Following the palace’s response, Charles Spencer has publicly defended the accuracy and content of his account. This exchange has resulted in a notable public dispute between Earl Spencer and the royal institution.
The specific title of the book and its publication date were not provided in the available information. Details regarding the exact nature of the alleged “contempt” or the specifics of the argument over the funeral procession beyond the fact that it occurred, were also not detailed.
This situation marks a significant moment in public commentary surrounding the royal family and their historical interactions, particularly concerning Princess Diana. The rare public statement from Buckingham Palace underscores the sensitivity of the allegations brought forth by Charles Spencer in his new work. The defense of the book’s content by Spencer indicates a continuing public dialogue on these historical claims from within the Spencer family.
Further details about the book’s content and the progression of this public dispute are expected as the narrative continues to unfold. The extent of any further official comment or public reaction remains to be seen.
The core of the disagreement centers on historical accounts and personal recollections brought to light by Earl Spencer. The public rebuttal by Buckingham Palace signifies a departure from customary silence, highlighting the perceived impact of the book’s allegations. The ongoing defense by Spencer suggests a commitment to the narrative presented within his publication.
The lack of explicit detail on the precise timeline of the alleged events, the specific phrasing used during the argument, or the full scope of the alleged “contempt” leaves certain aspects of the dispute open to interpretation pending further information. The current public dispute is characterized by the juxtaposition of a personal memoir’s claims against a rare institutional denial. The narrative continues to develop through public statements and defenses from the involved parties.
Story summarized from the original created by SYLVIA HUI on www.inquirer.com, see more information here.
